|
|
Post by jbnewyork162 on Jul 19, 2009 15:14:55 GMT -5
Also after you vote state why we should go after the selected option. thanks!  -Jason |
|
|
|
Post by irish2u2 on Jul 19, 2009 16:28:05 GMT -5
I picked David Lee. It seemed like a no-brainer to me. ; )
|
|
|
|
Post by whensly on Jul 19, 2009 20:09:50 GMT -5
Ricki Rubio
|
|
|
|
Post by daglazer on Jul 19, 2009 23:00:41 GMT -5
TMac because to get him means we finally get rid of Eddy Curry
|
|
|
|
Post by ReneNYG1 on Jul 20, 2009 7:51:05 GMT -5
David Lee,because my kid has his jersey and he's the best asset we have.Sure I want to dump Jeffries and Jeffries on Houston for TMac but getting Tmac is not the objective of that trade is opening cap room,but keeping our few assests is important.Getting Rubio would be important all three things are very important I would say signing Lee is an easy start to our plans.
|
|
|
|
Post by kgooglog on Jul 20, 2009 9:05:18 GMT -5
I voted for T-Mac, and my reason is identical to DA's. Getting rid of Eddy Curry is vital to 2010-11's cap-space.
|
|
|
|
Post by pearl on Jul 20, 2009 10:56:21 GMT -5
I voted for Lee. With all the talk of David possibly going elsewhere, I envision him as part of our future. I don't believe Walsh wants to see Lee go either.
Pearl
|
|
|
|
Post by neilverson on Jul 21, 2009 14:54:35 GMT -5
I voted for the general. I'd choose Boozer second. I think Lebron would love to play with Booz if we retained him. Sessions a close third. I'd like to see Duhon traded and Nate retained somehow, maybe for Sessions.
Douglas looks good in some spots, I'm not sure if he's a rotation guy from limited summer action I saw, are you guys sure of Tony?
|
|
|
|
Post by jbnewyork162 on Jul 23, 2009 14:00:19 GMT -5
I was hoping for full board participation on the poll vote because i thought we are missing a few but I will close and say I voted for Ramon sessions because I think he is one of those PG's on the rise like the NJ Nets PG(name escapes me at the moment) and the Warriors PG(Monta Ellis) or at least has the tools to have those potentials I should say.
You might not have motivation living and playing for a frugal owner in Herb Kohl and the lifeless and the going nowhere Milwaukee Bucks. Duhon can't become our starter even if we resign him past 2010. He is just underwhelming for our team even when he was healthy and I'd rather have had a young chris Childs or Charlie Ward who just seemed like better all around players than Duhon is.
Duhon is like diet point guard. all the taste but no filling. Ramon Sessions can penetrate AND drive a la Tony Parker and in this system with effectiveness no less and that's what I want in my point guard aside also from the usual pass first and make others better default qualities. Sessions doesnt seem like he would be, from every indication, the headache Marbury was. He is 23 and universally liked for what he brings to the court at his age. Why not?
I would hate to think the only moves we do is have only four guys not including Jeffries and curry as the only men we bring to the table to entice a big free agent to come here.
|
|
|
|
Post by greatgates on Jul 24, 2009 3:20:19 GMT -5
T-Mac because it means we had to dump some of that riffraff we have.
|
|
