|
|
Post by trendsetta on Dec 27, 2020 23:45:43 GMT -5
Weird how you picture him the victim. I suppose Anucha Brown Saunders was Snidely Whiplash for you?  Even weirder how you drew that conclusion and single handily took a light conversation about Disney dissing the Knicks to me defending Dolan and his handling of the Anucha Brown Saunders incident. On second thought not so weird. 😎 Can’t wait for your post on how Jimmy Dolan is responsible for COVID-19, global warming and foreign interference of our elective process. 😎 Dolan is the owner of the Knicks. He is initially, causally, materially, efficiently, and ultimately responsible. Owners by definition "take ownership" and do so in a transparent fashion, or they end up being lousy owners. In fact it is likely that when owners fall short of these standards they are essentially tyrants-- malignant narcissists or big babies or psychopaths-- who fear loss of power and wealth, making up for the neediness and impotence and insecurity they experience in infancy and childhood but spend a lifetime denying. What do you think all of Dolan's chronic meddling throughout the years is all about? Dolan is merely the worst among many owners. Sterling, Jones, Schott, Steinbrenner, and there are others. By the way the wall between the essence of Brown Sanders' lawsuit, ie exploitation, victimization, sexual assault... and Epstein's friendship is paper thin, weak as wet tissue paper. In a significant way, Ms. Brown Saunders helped catalyze the MeToo movement years ago. But please do go on and explain to me how you could possibly paint Dolan as a victim of any sort in your metaphor. Seems a bit of a stretch, a weird stretch at that |
|
