Does Elfrid technically have a no trade?

[Warwizard]

I've heard this mentioned on two different podcast and I dont know the truth to it, but it seems like because he was signed and then resigned on a one year that he technically has a no trade or veto rights? Anyone know if that's true?

[Deleted]

Most sites have not mentioned one. But one youtube guy did say yes.

[jbnewyork162]

Nov 23, 2020 19:13:06 GMT -5 Warwizard said:

I've heard this mentioned on two different podcast and I dont know the truth to it, but it seems like because he was signed and then resigned on a one year that he technically has a no trade or veto rights? Anyone know if that's true?

Not a no trade but for starters usually anyone signed period can't be traded for several months. I don’t know what the amended rules are.

So if we had a cool trade tomorrow we couldn't trade Rivers, Alec Burks, Payton and Noel because they all signed to be here on one years. We could however instantly trade anyone we acquired by trade.

[Warwizard]

I finally found some info that may help, this is per an article on hoops hype.
www.google.com/amp/s/hoopshype.com/2018/10/10/nba-bird-rights/amp/
"if a player has been on a team for two years and re-signs for a third year, they automatically inherit a no-trade clause on that third season. Why? Because it gives players the right to have to approve a trade which would cause them to lose the full Bird Rights that were about to be available to them.

Miami Heat sharpshooter Wayne Ellington can be used an example. He spent 2016-17 and 2017-18 with the Heat before re-signing with Miami on a one-year deal for 2018-19. That gives him a no-trade clause for this upcoming season because if he gets dealt, he would go back to non-Bird Rights status since he technically wouldn’t be spending three full years with a single team (in this case, the Heat), which would hurt his future earning power."

My thinking is that it wouldn't apply to Elfrid because he was only with the team the one year before his option was declined.