|
|
Post by jbnewyork162 on Nov 22, 2009 16:07:36 GMT -5
We actually played defense and damn was that a good game. No moral victories but I thought we had that one.
Thats really all i have to say.
-Jason
P.S. I know i might be in the minority here and I know I have been outspoken the most in saying negative things about him all season but I like Eddy Curry's aggressive attitude lately. He has an edge on him now that has been missing his whole career.
|
|
|
|
Post by kman414 on Nov 22, 2009 16:39:50 GMT -5
I didn't see the game yet...had to tape it. I heard the Knicks had a foul to give and didn't use it. Why not? Didn't this happen once before and cost us a game? Who's fault? D'Antoni?
Isn't he supposed to know what to do? Just asking !
|
|
|
|
Post by jbnewyork162 on Nov 22, 2009 16:46:44 GMT -5
In regards to that foul there wasnt an area to give it that wouldn't have created a shooting foul for Pierce as he flops like hell. so this time like last what killed us were three things. Eddy Curry's flagrant foul on Rondo. 2. Harrington not switching and manning up Garnett before the last shot. And finally 3, not having Nate Gall or Curry back in when they had a great first three quarters. They were in the final couple of minutes.
Its almost as if the Knicks dont like Gallinari anymore. He isnt being developed to do anything but hit threes and he has Dirk Nowitzki's skill set. It continues to boggle my mind. But without Eddy flagrant then Garnett shot would have still us had the lead and win at the end of regulation and not overtime.
|
|
|
|
Post by whensly on Nov 22, 2009 17:38:26 GMT -5
celts and other top shelf teams know how to save it for when they need it,
they know how to win. Our knicks don't have the confidence, talent or know-how,
hence my desire to give AI a spin.
Yes Eddie Curry is showing signs, which means he might really help OR be easily tradable.
I'd like to see a Darko (on D) and Eddie for scoring tandem upfront,
|
|
